![]() |
|
|||||||
| Off Topic A place to talk about just about anything. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
Absolutely not, they need to renegotiate the union workers because they cant afford to pay them what's promised and continue to sell sub par vehicles.
Besides they already have government involvement to prevent them from bankruptcy why do they need money to mask the problem. Let em burn and recover, its the only way. This sums it up quite nicely.: http://demotivationalblog.com/2008/0...ilboat-awaits/
__________________
Mark West |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 3
|
I agree... I think they should not bail them out. It's like saying-- go ahead and overspend and not use your money wisely. We (government) will bail you out. Why not bailout every company- why the automakers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
|
It is really a double edged sword. If they don't bail them out and they cannot reorganize and they go under, unemployment will skyrocket. The impact will shutdown every single dealer across the country. That being said the whole problem with the big 3 automakers is the unions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
It's a tricky decision for sure though. So many factors to consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Right Here
Posts: 1
|
If we do go ahead and bail these guys out, who will be next on the list asking for bailout money? Nobody is helping me out as a small business owner.
Perhaps these companies should have had a bit of money put aside. I don't know if it were up to me I would let them go under, but then the honest working man will suffer with the job losses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lone Tree, CO
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
What no one seems to explain, why would reorganization under Chapter 11 be so bad? The airlines have done it and survived. I think the real reason is that it is being pushed because the bailout would save the unions. Under Chapter 11 the car companies could reorganize and renegotiate the union contracts. That would be bad? How? Only to the people who the unions supported in this past election. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 14
|
I feel the bailout should only take effect after the unions have crumbled. They served their purpose when the auto industry was new and growing, but the ridiculous wages being given to new low-skill assembly line workers is insanely high and unwarranted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
|
I'm with you on this Kevin, it's just crazy how people with little to no training, expect to have the same income as someone who went to college and got a career. Granted I may be a little cold, but I still don't see why WE should pay for the companies mistakes.
If anything, this could be an opportunity for new companies to form and begin making cheap, reliable, efficient automobiles in the U.S. When it comes down to it, I think people will realize they don't need a DVD player and 3 TV's in their car. (and if they don't then they deserve to pay that much for something so stupid.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3
|
I don't think there should be any bailouts at all, not for the Big 3 and not for the financial institutios either. But I heard this morning that that the White House has decided to bail out the auto industry. I still want to know when the taxpers will get their bailout.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bailout, ford gm chrysler |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|